Middle Susquehanna Riverkeeper
  • Home
    • About Us
  • Donate
    • Partners
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Report a concern
  • Roundtables
  • Songs 2025
  • Educational Programs
    • Vernal School
    • HERYN >
      • Blue HERYN
    • Floating Classroom
    • EELS Program
    • Riverwalks
    • Nature Book Club
    • Kayaking/Fishing Resources
    • Video Lessons
  • Special Projects
    • West Branch Adventure
    • Hellbenders >
      • Hellbender Songs
    • BirdNET
    • Encina
    • Montour Surface Sampling
    • Vernal Pools
  • Gift Shop
  • Get Involved
    • Watershed Opportunities
    • Survey
    • Sentinels
  • Archive
    • Songs
    • Photos 2020
    • Songs 2021
    • Songs 2022
    • Songs 2023
    • Songs 2024
    • 2018 PA River of the Year
    • 10 Fun Facts
    • For Children
    • Class ideas
  • Contact Us

Riverkeeper reflections

New study shows key behavioral, physical impacts of increasing water temps on sculpin, headwaters

7/2/2024

2 Comments

 
Picture
Susquehanna University graduate Danielle Tryon, center, recently completed a study on how sculpin react to thermal changes in streams. At left is a sculpin at Stony Run, near Lewisburg. Top right is the network of manmade stream channels Tryon used to study the sculpin at Susquehanna's Freshwater Research Institute and bottom right is a sculpin being measured in the lab.
​Riverkeeper note: The following story and podcast package was created/written by Middle Susquehanna Riverkeeper John Zaktansky. You can contact him directly here.

Much more active than originally anticipated, freshwater sculpin instinctively swim upstream when threatened by thermal changes in headwater environments even when cooler water options are not accessible according to a study by recent Susquehanna University graduate Danielle Tryon.

“We expected to see changes over time in their physical condition, but what we didn’t realize was that this species moves around as much as it does when stressed by water temperature changes,” said Tryon, who conducted the study over the course of a year using manmade stream channels at the university’s Freshwater Research Institute (FRI).
​
“These channels are recirculating, and each is the same temperature throughout, but in channels with higher temperatures, the sculpin instinctively swam upstream to search for cooler water, which is fascinating,” said Matt Wilson, head of the FRI. “It would be easier to say they found cold water randomly and just sat there, but in these channels where temperatures were consistent across the moving water, they automatically swam upstream to look for relief. There wasn’t any randomness about it.”
Setting up the study
Tryon spent a year and a half repurposing 20-foot-long stream channels with the goal of using them to study sculpin and the species’ reaction to thermal changes in an effort to better understand how climate change could be impacting headwater fisheries.

“The past four years, these channels were basically sitting unfinished and I went in last spring and did all the engineering. I was under them with caulk guns and drills and saws getting them built to best replicate headwater stream environments for this study,” Tryon said.

“We incorporated UV light and made sure water was circulating at the same rate as you’d find in a natural stream setting. We added substrate specific to headwater streams and included macroinvertebrates and other elements to best replicate this environment because it is being impacted the most by climate change and can be so critical for our cold-water species.”

Tryon targeted sculpin because she saw them as a great indicator of thermal stress.

“They are in the same habitat as brook trout, which are a more recreationally vital species and usually get more funding,” she said. “Sculpin are a little smaller, so they can model things in the stream channel better. They are also benthic low-mobility fish, which means they don’t move very much.”

However, the sculpin – which Tryon collected from Stony Run near Lewisburg, were much more active than anticipated.
​
“Within four hours of being put into the channels, they were all over,” said Wilson. “There is a lot that happens in our streams that we just assume, and observing these fish in this environment was a good example of how much more we have to learn.”

In fact, the original study wasn’t going to factor in fish behavior in relation to thermal changes – simply physical changes.

“We basically were just going to put them in, feed them and see what happened, and then take them out and see whether they gained or lost weight,” said Wilson. “But Danielle realized within the first couple of days that their movement was a key variable to consider.”

Within different channels, Tryon studied the sculpin in different water temperatures.

“The standard, which they were the happiest, was set to 10 degrees Celsius (50 degrees Fahrenheit),” she said. “Then we intentionally stressed them out in the other channels. Our moderate stress environment had water temperature at 16 degrees Celsius (60F) and in another we had them at one of the highest levels they could be, at 22 degrees Celsius (72F).”

Beyond the behavioral reaction to these different environments, the sculpin were impacted physically, as well.

“We were seeing declines in weight, with individuals moving out of higher-temp areas when they had the capability,” Tryon said. “However, among those not strong enough to get out of the stressed sections, we saw a noticeable decline in body condition.”
Picture
Listen to the full interview with Danielle Tryon about her research with sculpin and what we should learn from it in the most recent episode of the Middle Susquehanna Riverkeeper Podcast:
Picture
From left, Matt Wilson, Danielle Tryon and Daniel Ressler pose for a photo at a poster session for Tryon's sculpin research.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Waterway impacts
In both scenarios, regardless of whether a sculpin was impacted physically or behaviorally, there can be an immediate effect on the aquatic ecosystem, according to Tryon.

“Sculpin are just a specific part of a bigger food web, where trout are near the top of the aquatic food web. If sculpin react to thermal stress by moving out of a certain section of waterway, you are going to see an increase in macroinvertebrates and algae,” said Tryon. “It is like removing an important part of a puzzle, and then just telling the remaining species to figure it out on their own and hope for the best.”

Wilson agreed.

“Sculpin are middle predators – they eat macros and fish eggs while also functioning as food for trout. If you think about a stream with both sculpin and trout in it, you get this interaction where sculpin are at the bottom eating bugs and other things which allow the trout to feed more on the surface,” he said. “If sculpin aren’t there, it changes things for all the species remaining. This all requires more research to know more about what would happen specifically, but there is a definite change.”
 
What’s next
In fact, Tryon admits there are numerous potential next-step studies with sculpin that could help us better understand the aquatic ecosystem and how to better protect it.

“We could go in and add discharge at high flow rates that could be caused by different phenomenon or a low discharge to represent drought situations. As we change those discharge circumstances, we can pair it with thermal fluctuations and learn so much more,” she said. “We can also go in and add blocks in the channels to look at culvert or dam impacts to the species in relation to thermal changes, or put sediment in the water to look at turbidity and how mucking up the water influences species.”

Tryon’s efforts to make these stream channels at the Freshwater Research Institute viable for research opens many potential doors for future research, Wilson admitted.

“I have a couple of ideas around stream morphology and how particles move in a stream and to look at deposition and erosion. It would be cool to also experimentally measure how sediments build behind structures like beaver dams,” he said. “I am also interested in doing some bigger food web experiments. Like introducing various salamanders, species of fish and aquatic insects, but doing a much longer experiment.”

Tryon, who has moved to Alaska since her Susquehanna University graduation, where she works on research involving salmon weirs, admits that her time at Susquehanna and this study specifically has helped her realize a lifelong dream.

“Growing up, I always wanted to be a scientist. Being at Susquehanna and working in the labs and the Freshwater Research Institute, and then various opportunities with the (Middle Susquehanna) Riverkeeper association have provided so many great opportunities to be the scientist I always wanted to be,” she said. “I learned to be adaptable to be in the field doing studies, to see things in a different way and hopefully have been able to help in at least a small part with my work.”

Along those lines, everyone – scientist or not – has the ability to make a difference, Tryon added.

“Be curious and don’t be afraid to ask questions,” she said. “Find people in your community, whether it is through a nonprofit or a university or even a neighbor, and ask your questions, learn more about this world and your place in it and then get involved.”

Those interested in getting involved in various ways with the Middle Susquehanna Riverkeeper Association are encouraged to fill out the group's online Susquehanna Survey.
2 Comments
Rob Barbour
7/2/2024 05:56:58 pm

Not being a biologist or hydrologist I have wonder for years now the impacts the gas industry industrial water withdrawals are having on our watershed feeder streams. When millions of gallons of freshwater are sucked out of streams daily such as the Loyalsock Creek that means the feeder streams must empty quicker to fill that void. Less water means higher water temps. for what water is left. With at least 3 current water withdrawal sites and now possible a 4th (EQT's in Hillsgrove) The Loyalsock Creek is potentially loosing 6-8 million gallons a day, day after day. I would bet my next retirement check that the SRBC has not taken any such research as you have done into consideration when they rubber stamp industry water taking projects. I think you are scratching the surface of the impacts of water temperature on our aquatic life in our streams. Keep up the solid scientific work. Rob Barbour

Reply
John Zaktansky
7/5/2024 08:32:43 am

Rob,

Definitely a good point and something I have reached out to the SRBC about. I interviewed one of their people a few months ago and am working on a package that goes over how water withdrawal projects in general are vetted out and will be sharing out that package soon. There are so many different dynamics with potential impacts on our aquatic ecosystems.

John

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    Riverkeeper John Zaktansky is an award-winning journalist and avid promoter of the outdoors who loves camping, kayaking, fishing and hunting with the family. 

    Regional Directors Emily Shosh and Andrew Bechdel joined the team in early 2024 with a wide variety of natural experiences and a desire to educate.

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020

    Topics

    All

    RSS Feed

Your Pollution Hotline Number:
​570-768-6300

SUPPORT OUR WORK
Take our survey

BY BECOMING A SUSQUEHANNA NEIGHBOR TODAY.
​FROM CLEAN WATER FLOW THRIVING COMMUNITIES.

Picture

​Middle Susquehanna Riverkeeper is a member of Waterkeeper Alliance. Riverkeeper is a registered trademark and service mark of Riverkeeper, Inc. and is licensed for use herein. Waterkeeper is a registered trademark and service mark of Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. and is licensed for use herein.

  • Home
    • About Us
  • Donate
    • Partners
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Report a concern
  • Roundtables
  • Songs 2025
  • Educational Programs
    • Vernal School
    • HERYN >
      • Blue HERYN
    • Floating Classroom
    • EELS Program
    • Riverwalks
    • Nature Book Club
    • Kayaking/Fishing Resources
    • Video Lessons
  • Special Projects
    • West Branch Adventure
    • Hellbenders >
      • Hellbender Songs
    • BirdNET
    • Encina
    • Montour Surface Sampling
    • Vernal Pools
  • Gift Shop
  • Get Involved
    • Watershed Opportunities
    • Survey
    • Sentinels
  • Archive
    • Songs
    • Photos 2020
    • Songs 2021
    • Songs 2022
    • Songs 2023
    • Songs 2024
    • 2018 PA River of the Year
    • 10 Fun Facts
    • For Children
    • Class ideas
  • Contact Us